. . . On the subject of my having a pet. I pretty much covered all the issues of what a responsibility one takes on in adopting a pet, but there is one other consideration, the one that may truly be my biggest issue. The one that caused me to suffer buyer’s regret and a mild panic attack.
I am emotional. You all knew that. I rarely make a decision that is not gut instinct-based, which has its pros and cons (very often the latter). But more than that, I am very emotional when it comes to animals. Let me clarify this by saying that I am not the kind of person who would start selling family heirlooms to pay for a pet to have surgery; I’m very pragmatic when it comes to that sort of thing.
What I mean is that I am emotional when it comes to their feelings and well-being. Sometimes, I really believe I know what they are thinking and how they feel. And I get very upset when I see their pain. By way of an example, the other day I tried to watch Meerkat Manor which was a huge mistake. A snake bit one of a pair of siblings and the surviving one sat by his dying sister, licking her and watching her die.
I got very upset about it and would have strangled any old snake that happened to wander by in vengeance. Something similar almost happened on a show about hippos, but I saw the crocodile and knew what was going to happen to the baby hippo and changed the station in time to miss it. It’s a good thing; I can’t afford crocodile shoes, not even for the sake of sweet revenge.
Those animals were only on television so you can imagine how much more attached I get to those I actually know. The deaths of some of my pets were more difficult to get through than the deaths of two of my grandparents (although I did pull out all the stops and cater their funerals very nicely, so don’t feel bad for them).
I do not want an animal to have that kind of hold over me again. Nor do I want an animal to be that reliant on me. Dexter used to start wailing if I was in the bathroom for more than five minutes, thinking I’d been Shanghai-d. If I was busy and ignored John Morgan, he’d give me a wounded look (highly effective), then go under my bed and pout (don’t ask how I know he was pouting while he was under the bed–I know what I know).
An animal relies on a person for food and shelter and the like, but I don’t know that it should like us more than it does another animal. I wasn’t sure if I had it in me to avoid a repeat of this. How do you teach an animal to be self-sufficient? It’s not like you can send it to boarding school or something. But then I began to think of the way the pets of friends and relatives act towards their owners, and I saw that it is nothing at all like what mine did.
None of them have pets like Dexter or John Morgan, both of whom worshipped me. (That is not my ego speaking; it’s a fact.) So, the problem is me. I allowed my pets to see me as an equal (Monty used to bang his head against mine like big cats do to each other in the wild) and in return I treated them as equals. I simply cannot do that this time around.
I have to become Grandpa Joe. After Grandma Gwen died, Grandpa was left with her dog Toby. Grandpa did not like pets in any form, but it was my grandmother’s dog so he cared for it. And he cared for it better than many people who actually like dogs might have, but their relationship was cordial and nothing more.
They got along very well, but were essentially companions who had little in common and happened to share a house. And that dog knew which one of them called the shots. This is what I have to do. There were always things about this grandfather that I admired and wished I could emulate better, but his behavior towards an animal never occurred to me as something to aspire to until now.





8 responses so far ↓
Anonymous // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 9:27 am
So I’m just reading all of this after you said “Read the blog.” Perhaps it is my psychology background, but my first thought was that you are fearful of the attachment that you had to your cats after having to watch them leave you. How painful it was for you. And you’re thinking why would you want to put yourself through that again? Clearly you are keeping a distance with Figaro. But I think that may be a losing battle. When you have the kind o fempahty that allows you to take care of squirrels in your yard, I can’t imagine that your nature will allow you to keep any kind of distance from Figaro.
I hope you can figure it out. Think of the joy and love you experienced with John Morgan and Dexter. There may be relief in the lack of responsibility and the worry and pain that might go along with it when you don’t have a pet to love, but there is less connection, less intensity, less to experience. And that’s really what life is about, isn’t it? Our experiences, our feelings, our attachments. Give yourself time to see if your desire to love is stronger than your desire to avoid pain.
You know what? I can’t proofread what I wrote. I hope it was good.
amysue // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 9:31 am
I forgot to put my name and I typoed. I meant to type when you have the kind of empathy that allows you to take care of squirrels…
I didn’t mean to be preachy. I just value empathy and kindness and the ability to love, and I think you are cheating yourself if you don’t allow those natural qualities that you so obviously possess to be expressed.
apremerson // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 10:21 am
Amysue, you make a very valid point. And to some degree you are right; I probably don’t want to suffer that kind of pain again. And the question of whether not feeling pain is worth giving up joy (or as you said, love) is one I have asked myself for a good portion of my life. But there’s a whole other side to it.
I think having those kind of strong attachments to animals, which has always come easy and natural to me, replaced my forming those attachments with people, which has never been easy or natural for me. I have often (in fact more often that I prefer to admit) regarded other people with a kind of detached amusement, shock, horror, or irritation. As if they belonged to another species whom I was in someway related to, but not quite enough to understand what the hell they were all about.
I can’t make any guarantee that I will ever fully overcome that, but allowing an animal to become more important than a fellow human being might guarantee I will not.
amysue // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Wow, that’s some serious self-recognition there. Bravo for your honesty and awareness. And I’m very seriously seeing people the way you have. But my drive has always been to understand and still connect. I don’t think I would be in a place where an animal could take that place for me, yet I’m not one feeding squirrels in my backyard.
I wish you peace of mind, Cat, whatever that entails. That cat is adorable, he’ll have no trouble finding a home if yours doesn’t work out for him.
A last thought. Being a unique personality can be a lonely proposition when you don’t have the support or appreciation of people around you. This blog is a great way for you to find that support system, a way to reach people who are not in close proximity, but who are out there to value you. Okay, done being corny.
Martha // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 12:27 pm
I can’t say much of any help. Seuss is very much a part of the family. He is fully convinced that he is my baby, and that I am the momma cat. How this transpired, I do not know – he adopted us when he was five years old, not five weeks – but there it is.
apremerson // Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Thanks again Amysue for your input, and Martha don’t worry about not having sage words. I’ve blogged my way through this and all the comments (here and elsewhere) have got me to this honest a place.
The rest is up to me to deal with. In any case, the cat is staying since I am the issue, not him. And he is a very good cat.
Marina // Monday, July 7, 2008 at 7:11 am
Cats hit you harder emotionally because they
are psychic and their nervous systems are as
developed as ours. It’s a different attachment
than dogs. That said, I’ve always treated my
“boys” be they feline or hound, with great
respect and take my responsibilities seriously.
I really can’t imagine a life without them,
they’ve given me so much. And yes, I’m devast-
ed when they pass but I always think of how
much better my life was with them. I don’t
believe they worship me but I do believe they
respect me and love me as one of their own,
I think that’s amazing.
Having dealt with the deaths of my parents I
don’t lie when I say that Gunney is my rock,
and we really do take care of one another. I
know that our time is limited which I why I
spend as much time with him as I can. That’s
how I approached the last few years with my
parents. I’m so blessed to have Gunney in my
life, I think the best thing I can do when it
happens is to welcome another 4 legged friend
into my life…he’d want that, I know he would,
but that’s long into the future…knock on wood.
But everyone is different….
Marina // Monday, July 7, 2008 at 7:18 am
I just read Amy Sue’s comments and yours…I
do understand what you mean about the attach-
ment to animals versus people. Humans are
extremely judgemental and animals aren’t…they
appreciate it when someone cares for them and
they reciprocate…
For years, my animals were a substitute for
relationships with people in that I was going
thru so much relating to my parents and their
illnesses…I didn’t have a support system
because no one else was dealing with those
types of issues and emotions.
I can say, that since their deaths, I’ve work-
ed hard to make an effort to form relationships
Mainly because emotionally I can handle the
rejection better…I think that makes sense.
But you know, the hound is still a great
companion. We genuinely enjoy each others
company and that’s just the way it goes.
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.